[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [aspectj-users] LTW, javaagent, JUnit and ANT integration
|
When you write
call(* Service+.print(..)) && @annotation(MemberOfMonitoredSet);
That means to match any join point shadow that is a call to methods
print(..) declared on subtypes of Service, and whose declaration is
annotated by the annotation MemberOfMonitoredSet (ie the method is
annotated).
In your case the annotation is a class level one on the interface
implemented by the declaring type.
You thus need a different pointcut (or move the annotation to the method).
I am sure using AJDT is the best way to better understand how the
@annotation pointcut designator behaves.
The doc (AspectJ 5 dev. book) explains that better than I do I guess:
The @annotation pointcut designator matches any join point where the
subject of the join point has an annotation of the given type.
And see http://eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/next/adk15notebook/join-point-modifiers.html
for what the "subject" means.
Alex
On 8/10/05, Valerio Schiavoni <ervalerio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Alexandre Vasseur ha scritto:
>
> >I'll commit a test case. If you can isolate the issue with your
> >fractal generated class please open a bugzilla issue.
> >Thanks
> >Alex
> >
> >
> just to be sure, i did a simple small case without generated classes,
> but with corresponding java files (or a simplified version with relevant
> annotations inside).
> I'll attach to this email, it's enough untar the ltwtest.tgz, it will
> create a ltwtest directory.
> then to copy aspectjrt.jar aspectjtools.jar aspectjweaver.jar inside a
> ltwtest/externals directory
> and launch :
> ant compile test
>
> the aspect is not applied, even if i think it's properly written: again,
> the pointcut is for call to method print taking any parameter on
> objects istances of classes implementing the Service interface or its
> subinterfaces, which contains an annotation:
>
> pointcut annotatedResourceInvocation():
> call(* Service+.print(..)) && @annotation(MemberOfMonitoredSet);
>
> When this will pass, we'll try to investigate why the testcase with
> corresponding generated classes is not working.
>
> Valerio
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
>
>
- References:
- [aspectj-users] LTW, javaagent, JUnit and ANT integration
- Re: [aspectj-users] LTW, javaagent, JUnit and ANT integration
- Re: [aspectj-users] LTW, javaagent, JUnit and ANT integration
- Re: [aspectj-users] LTW, javaagent, JUnit and ANT integration
- Re: [aspectj-users] LTW, javaagent, JUnit and ANT integration
- Re: [aspectj-users] LTW, javaagent, JUnit and ANT integration
- Re: [aspectj-users] LTW, javaagent, JUnit and ANT integration
- Re: [aspectj-users] LTW, javaagent, JUnit and ANT integration