Re: [aspectj-users] Mixin migration

[Adrian Colyer <adrian.colyer@xxxxxxxxx>]

The developerWorks articles have a very long lead time (several
months!). So at the time I originally wrote that, I had hoped that M3
would already be out. Everything described in the article will be
included in AspectJ 5 when it is released  (with the exception that
the pointcut "execution<T>(T DataBucket<T>.getData())" may not be
supported as per the generics simplification proposal being discussed
on this list). Some of the @AspectJ support (as Alex described) will
not make it until the M4 milestone build however. When we release M3,
I will also ask dW to update the article text to make it clear exactly
what is and is not supported in the M3 build, and what requires M4.

Regards, Adrian.

On 01/08/05, Tomasz Nazar <Tomasz.Nazar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On the next beautiful day: Thu, 28 July, 2005, Alexandre Vasseur wrote:
> 
> > Hi Mohan
> >
> > Don't expect mixin to be implemented in the upcoming AspectJ 5 M3
> > milestones. It will be in the M4.
> 
> 
> Hi there!
> 
> I don't get it :( I read AOP@WORK 8 by Adrian and see clearly
> @ManagedComponent, Lifecycle interface and the default implementation
> for the interface which is the mixin. So, what are we talking about
> here?  Do I miss something?
> 
> 
> > I'll be interested though in knowing more what kind of feature from
> > AspectWerkz mixin you are using (f.e. perClass / perInstance from
> > AspectWerkz 2.0, transient mixin, custom mixin factory)
> 
> Surely, I need transent mixins..
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Nazar
> 
> 
> --
>   _i______'simplicity_is_the_key'__________tomasz_nazar
>   _ii____'i_am_concern_oriented'__________________iiuwr
>   _iii__'patsystem.sf.net'___________________linux_user
>   _Heaven_&_Fellows,_PPP______________________prevayler
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> 


-- 
-- Adrian
adrian.colyer@xxxxxxxxx