Re: [aspectj-users] Additional Information Passing

[Matthew Webster <matthew_webster@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Simon,

What are your criteria for excluding a piece of information from the trace?
How do you wish to exclude it (not trace the method at all or just the
object)? How does passing additional information (what do you have in mind)
help with this problem?

Matthew Webster
AOSD Project
Java Technology Centre, MP146
IBM Hursley Park, Winchester,  SO21 2JN, England
Telephone: +44 196 2816139 (external) 246139 (internal)
Email: Matthew Webster/UK/IBM @ IBMGB, matthew_webster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://w3.hursley.ibm.com/~websterm/

Simon Heinzle <simon.heinzle@xxxxxxxxxx>@eclipse.org on 03/05/2005 16:31:20

Please respond to aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx

Sent by:    aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx


To:    AspectJ <aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject:    [aspectj-users] Additional Information Passing


Hi all,

Is there really no way to pass additional information to a pointcut
other than Joinpoints, Parameter Arguments, ... ?

We're currently working on a Logging-Aspect, but we must be able to mask
out security sensitive parameters. One pointcut + advice for each
"masking configuration" (Parameter 1 logged, Param 2 not, ..) is a
solution, but not a very readable and extensible one (and of course, 6
parameter-methods could possibly infer 64 such pointcuts).

Any suggestions how to solve this problem?

Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users