[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [aspectj-users] context with and without annotations
|
You have right, I confused this two concepts.
In my real case, I defined this method but I didn't call it, as in my message.
Sorry for the false aspectj problem, I return reading "Java annotations tutorial" ;-)
Mickaël
-----Message d'origine-----
De : aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]De la part de Eric Bodden
Envoyé : vendredi 8 avril 2005 15:54
À : aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Objet : RE: [aspectj-users] context with and without annotations
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rifflard Mickaël wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Sorry for this mistake but I have simplified my case for writing
> this message and I made an error.
>
> The call to myMethod is
> moc.myMethod("sample",mc);
> instead of
> moc.myMethod("sample",moc);
And still: Also the object mc of type MyClass is no subtype of
MyAnnotation! You must not mix up the "annotated with" and "subtype
of" relation. IMHO this would still be no valid Java.
Eric
- --
Eric Bodden
Chair I2 for Programming Languages and Program Analysis
RWTH Aachen University
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
iQA/AwUBQlaM4MwiFCm7RlWCEQKJugCfYLsmXODXVvi8dj4u/cHJbR7x2wkAniQt
f3+thFDZIttppXa2c4Tiy6s3
=M6xQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
