[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [aspectj-users] remote objects
- From: "Sirrurg" <sirrurg@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:44:08 +0200
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
The instrumentation would be for tracing purposes to figure out the usage
of the remote objects. Actually i think it would be sufficient to instrument
the stubs, as they will be used anyway. But i am not sure if there are some
other aspects i missed to look at, thats why i am asking.
Probably someone already has expirience with it?!?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Valerio Schiavoni" <ervalerio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 12:56 AM
Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] remote objects
Sirrurg@xxxxxxx ha scritto:
i have a question. Is it possible to use aspectj also on rmi objects?
and whats about the need of the library then?
i'm not an expert about RMI, but the question is: why should'nt it work ?
Do you need to instrument stub or skeleton .class files? And if so, to do
How would you like to use AspectJ in your use case?
aspectj-users mailing list