[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [aspectj-users] remote objects

The instrumentation would be for tracing purposes to figure out the usage
of the remote objects. Actually i think it would be sufficient to instrument just
the stubs, as they will be used anyway. But i am not sure if there are some
other aspects i missed to look at, thats why i am asking.
Probably someone already has expirience with it?!?


----- Original Message ----- From: "Valerio Schiavoni" <ervalerio@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 12:56 AM
Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] remote objects



Sirrurg@xxxxxxx ha scritto:

hi everyone,

i have a question. Is it possible to use aspectj also on rmi objects?
and whats about the need of the library then?

hi,
i'm not an expert about RMI, but the question is: why should'nt it work ?
Do you need to instrument stub or skeleton .class files? And if so, to do what ?
How would you like to use AspectJ in your use case?


bye,
Valerio
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users