Re: [aspectj-users] remote objects

["Sirrurg" <sirrurg@xxxxxxx>]

The instrumentation would be for tracing purposes to figure out the usage
of the remote objects. Actually i think it would be sufficient to instrument 
just
the stubs, as they will be used anyway. But i am not sure if there are some
other aspects i missed to look at, thats why i am asking.
Probably someone already has expirience with it?!?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Valerio Schiavoni" <ervalerio@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 12:56 AM
Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] remote objects


> Sirrurg@xxxxxxx ha scritto:
>
> > hi everyone,
> >
> > i have a question. Is it possible to use aspectj also on rmi objects?
> > and whats about the need of the library then?
> hi,
> i'm not an expert about RMI, but the question is: why should'nt it work ?
> Do you need to instrument stub or skeleton .class files? And if so, to do 
> what ?
> How would you like to use AspectJ in your use case?
>
> bye,
> Valerio
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users