Re[2]: [aspectj-users] Name of the class and staticinitialization

[v_peter <v_peter@xxxxxxx>]

Hello, Rifflard,

The variable "thisJoinPointStaticPart" represents the helper object of
"org.aspectj.lang.JoinPoint.StaticPart". It contains static
information about your join point and gives some performanse
improvements as compared with using "thisJoinPoint" because the
"thisJoinPoint" is created in run-time.
thisJoinPoint.getSignature() == thisJoinPointStaticPart.getSignature()

On Jan 14, 2005, 12:48:45, you wrote:

> Hi Peter,

> I had not seen that the method getSignature was available on thisJoinPointStaticPart.

> Thanks,

> Mickaël RIFFLARD
> Atos Origin

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : aspectj-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:aspectj-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]De la part de v_peter
> Envoyé : vendredi 14 janvier 2005 11:38
> À : aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Objet : Re: [aspectj-users] Name of the class and staticinitialization


> Hello, Rifflard.

> You can use also "thisJoinPointStaticPart" instead of "thisJoinPoint"

> On Jan 13, 2005, 19:48:23, you wrote:

>> Hi,

>> I am trying to get the name of the class in advice associated
>> with staticinitialization joinpoint.
>> I succeeded with this sample : 

>>         public class C {...}

>>         public aspect A {

>>                 after() : staticinitialization(*) {
>>                         System.out.println("Class name : " +
>> thisJoinPoint.getSignature().getDeclaringTypeName());
>>                 }
>>         }

>> wich return

>>         Class name : C


>> Is this the only method ? 
>> Is this one is good from a performance point of view ?

>> Thanks,

>> Mickaël RIFFLARD
>> Atos Origin


>> _______________________________________________
>> aspectj-users mailing list
>> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users


-- 
Best regards,
v_peter
v_peter@xxxxxxx