Re: [aspectj-users] [aspect-users] Static initialization with JDK 1.5 an

[Andrew Clement <CLEMAS@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Also ...

following on from my last post, this
will work for you with the dev build:

after(): within(@Entity *) &&
staticinitialization(*) {
}

And I meant to mention earlier that
@within should also work:

after(): @within(@Entity) &&
staticinitialization(*) {
}

And for @within to work, you can use
base 1.5.0M1 - you don't need to download the latest dev build.

Andy.
---

Rifflard Mickaël <Mickael.Rifflard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: aspectj-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

13/01/2005 09:19

Please respond to
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx

To	<aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[aspectj-users] [aspect-users] Static initialization with JDK 1.5 annotation

Hi all,

I'm currently trying to match static initialization of objects with annotation.

I try this

                
public aspect StaticInit {

                
                 after()
: staticinitialization(@Entity test.*) {
                
                 
               
System.out.println(thisJoinPoint.getSignature().toString());
                
                 }
                
}

If I execute this aspect on source code :

                
@Entity
                
public class A {}
and
                
public class B {
                
                 public
static void main(String[] args) {
                
                 
               
A a = new A();
                
                 }
                
}

I obtain

                
B.<clinit>
                
A.<clinit>

I don't understand why my aspect match B initialization whereas this object
does not have the annotation.

Is this a bad writing ? If so, what is the good writing ?

Thanks,

Mickaël RIFFLARD
Atos Origin

_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users