Re: [aspectj-users] Problem compiling J2SE 5.0 source with ajc

[pope <alexandru.popescu@xxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

[quote Andrew Clement::on 1/7/2005 12:10 AM]
| Unfortunately, no, if the annotation has source retention then it isnt in
| the RuntimeVisibleAnnotation or RuntimeInvisibleAnnotation attributes in
| the class file - and its the class file we weave.
|

Thanks Andy for confirming my guess. Seeing the initial piece of code of this thread just make me
think of this.


- --
:pope

| As a rule we don't have join points for anything that doesn't exist in the
| class file.  Besides this case, the other well known example is that you
| can't put after advice on a handler join point because the end of a catch
| block isn't reliably identifiable in the class file when its obvious in
| the source.  We have this rule so the semantics of weaving are the same
| regardless of whether you pass source or binary inputs to the weaver.
|
| cheers,
| Andy.
|
| p.s. Adrian did start looking at the new compiler on schedule :)
|
| ---
| Andy Clement
| AspectJ Committer
| clemas@xxxxxxxxxx
|
|
|
|
| pope <alexandru.popescu@xxxxxxxxx>
| Sent by: aspectj-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
| 06/01/2005 19:21
| Please respond to
| aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
|
| To
| aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
| cc
|
| Subject
| Re: [aspectj-users] Problem compiling J2SE 5.0 source with ajc
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [quote Adrian Colyer::on 1/5/2005 12:35 PM]
| |> Do you have any sort of estimate when you'll start integrating the new
| |> jdt into AspectJ?
| |
| | I plan on starting that tomorrow...
| |
| | -- Adrian
| | Adrian_Colyer@xxxxxxxxxx
| |
| |
| |
| | Rafal Krzewski <Rafal.Krzewski@xxxxxxxxx>
| | Sent by: aspectj-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
| | 05/01/2005 10:21
| | Please respond to
| | aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
| |
| |
| | To
| | aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
| | cc
| |
| | Subject
| | Re: [aspectj-users] Problem compiling J2SE 5.0 source with ajc
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Adrian Colyer wrote:
| |
| |> The Eclipse JDT
| |> team released a full Java 5 compiler in their 3.1 M4 release just
| before
| |
| |> Christmas, so our next task is to pick that up and integrate it into
| |> AspectJ for the M2 release (and then we *will* be able to support
| source
| |
| |> compilation).
| |
| | They did, 3 months ahead of original schedule, if I recall correctly.
| | This means that a score of issues is to be found and fixed yet, but its
| | out there to take. The work on the compiler was resumed already after
| | holiday break - jdt.core v_530 was released to integration yesterday.
| |
| | Do you have any sort of estimate when you'll start integrating the new
| | jdt into AspectJ?
| |
| | regards,
| | Rafal
| | _______________________________________________
| | aspectj-users mailing list
| | aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
| | http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
| |
| |
| | _______________________________________________
| | aspectj-users mailing list
| | aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
| | http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
| |
| I see an interesting question here: can AJ work on annotations with
| retention type set on source? Is
| this present inside the bytecode as to allow ajc in the 2nd step to take
| the necessary actions?
|
| --
| :pope
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFB3bozTTDTje0R2dgRAmUnAKCHet9audqrz6MF9gxmdzZahNvHXQCgim+z
2BA1860BgK7HyWQdj9BYnL8=
=wJYL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----