[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [aspectj-users] [AspectJ] Why do I need aspectjrt.jar
|
There is nothing special about the bytecodes produced by the AspectJ
compiler - they are fully compliant with the JVM specification (and if they
aren't in any case, that would be a serious bug). The requirement for
aspectjrt.jar to be on the classpath is no different to the requirement for say
log4j.jar to be on the classpath if you used Log4j.
If the server is using 100% CPU resources, is it possible you've got some
advice that is advising itself? I know self-advice is cheaper than going to an
outside consultant, but it generally ends up using a lot of CPU and dying with a
StackOverflowError ;).
-- Adrian.
adrian_colyer@xxxxxxxxxx
06 August 2004 15:06
To: <aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
From: "Sascha Benkart" <Sascha.Benkart@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE:
[aspectj-users] [AspectJ] Why do I need aspectjrt.jar
Hi
Russ,
thanks
for your answer. I used AspectJ in former projects (without the Integration
Server) and I really love it.
Thus I
want to use it in my Integration Server package. But unfortunately the server
doesn't come up, using 100% of system resources. Is AspectJ really code
compatible to "normal" Java. Do you have any idea why it is not possible to use
it? Only standard lib jce.jar is replaced by iac.jar, another security
component. Is there a tool to compare Java code with and without AspectJ
weaving.
Regards,
Sascha
Hi Sascha,
You need aspectjrt.jar to support the objects
that AspectJ compilation has added into your application to facilitate your
aspects.
During the compilation process the ajc command line tool
weaves in certain constructs to make your aspects work. This weaving, whilst
totally compatible with regular object-oriented Java, requires some additional
support features that are available in the aspectjrt.jar and so, just like in
any other application where you are using extra facilities beyond the standard
libraries, you need to have those constructs available at runtime as well as
compile time.
Hope this makes sense :-)
Russ
On 5 Aug
2004, at 21:36, Sascha Benkart wrote:
Hi,/smaller>/fontfamily>
I
want to use AspectJ 1.2 for a webMethods Integration Server (Java 1.4,
but without jce.jar) project. Unfortunately the server is not running if I
add a package (a Java unit) compiled with AspectJ (using 100% of system
resource)./smaller>/fontfamily>
AspectJ
weaves the aspect code into the existing classes. Why do I need to add the
aspectjrt.jar to my project on runtime? At compile time it is clear why I
need the jar file./smaller>/fontfamily>
Cheers!/smaller>/fontfamily>
Sascha/smaller>/fontfamily>