Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [aspectj-users] AJDT and eclipse 3.0RC3


I'm sorry you are having such problems Robert.  Do I remember from a
post of yours a while ago that you are on Linux?  We do limited Linux
testing (we have only 2 linux boxes where we are) but I will get one
of the team to try it out this morning.

AJDT 1.1.11 is due imminently and contains a new version of the
visualiser, fully overhauled docs and a cheat sheet for creating
a simple project.

regards,
Andy.
---
AJDT/AspectJ development




robert kuzelj <robert_kuzelj@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: aspectj-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

23/06/2004 07:26

Please respond to
aspectj-users

To
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
Re: [aspectj-users] AJDT and eclipse 3.0RC3





hi ron,

> 1) Try compiling your project in AJDT,
??? dont understand what you mean by that.
i use the menu item "project|build project"
or "project|clean and 'clean selected... and build immediatly...'"
where i have a aspectj project eitherwise i would get a lot
of compiler errors.

>then open the Aspect Visualization perspective.
>Then in your projects window, click on your source folder.
thats what i do.

>That should display a visualization view of how all
>the aspects affect all the classes in your system.
thats what does not happen or it happens but albeit in
a very very limited way (like i said: there is exactly one
project where 3 out of 8 aspects are displayed...sometimes).

> 2) AJDT (currently?) only maintains a structure model for
>ONE project at a time. So if you recompile another
> AspectJ project, it will erase the model for your current project.

a) i wouldnt mind if i at least would get a view of that at a time
b) this at least explains why it sometimes takes so much time
   to switch.

thanks for you suggestions so far.

ciao robertj
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users


Back to the top