[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re[2]: [aspectj-users] ordered aspects
|
Hello,
Thanks I've found what I needed.
R.Adamus mailto:radamus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Wednesday, April 7, 2004, 10:11:58 AM, you wrote:
GH> Hi,
GH> I think you need to refer to the sectionon advice precedence
GH> in the AspectJ Programming Guide here ...
GH> http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextech.cgi/~checkout~/aspectj-home/doc/progguide/printable.html#d0e5867
GH> Hope this helps,
GH> George
GH> ________________________________________
GH> George C. Harley
GH> "R.Adamus" <radamus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GH> Sent by: aspectj-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
GH> 07/04/2004 09:03
GH> Please respond to
GH> aspectj-users
GH> To
GH> aspectj-users@eclipse.orgcc
GH> Subject
GH> [aspectj-users] ordered aspects
GH> Hello,
GH> I have a question about AspectJ semantics.
GH> Assume the situation where two concerns (concern2 and
GH> concern3) have thesame pointcut to the
GH> base concern1. Let say before call to the method foo(). Is it possible
GH> at all? Which concern will be executed first?
