Re: [aspectj-users] Re: aspectj-users digest, Vol 1 #472 - 6 msgs

[Lesiecki Nicholas <ndlesiecki@xxxxxxxxx>]

We're using JRockit 8.1sp2 compiled either with Sun 1.4.2 or JRockit
8.1sp2. It fails on even the simplest test case. Thanks for the report
though! Nice to know someone else is having an ok time with JRockit.

Cheers,
Nick

--- nicolas.correard@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> We're using AspectJ with JRockit here and never noticed any problem...
> (maybe there are some that we didn't see)
> in some of our aspects we do exactly what you describe in your bug
> description (add a field to a class)
> 
> We use the Sun JDK to compile (1.3.1_03) and JRockit 7.0sp4 on linux
> Redhat
> AS 2.4
> 
> /Nico
> 
> 
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:38:50 -0800 (PST)
> From: Lesiecki Nicholas <ndlesiecki@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [aspectj-users] Compatibility?
> Reply-To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Hello,
> 
> After submitting the following bug today re: AspectJ's compatibility with
> the JRockit JVM (hint: it isn't)
> 
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=52394
> 
> I was wondering what sort of compatibilty posture AspectJ is adopting.
> Obviously obscure bugs on AS400 JVMs are not the highest priority.
> However,
> does AspectJ say: "you should be able to run this bytecode anywhere and
> incompatibilities are likely the result of the JVM" or does it say:
> "we've
> tested it on Sun, otherwise you're on your own." (The preceeding
> statements
> are exagerrated of course.)
> 
> Or to put a finer point on it: who should fix this bug, BEA or AspectJ?
> 
> (P.S. I'm not trying to be aggressive here, just looking for
> information.)
> 
> Nick
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *************************************************************************
> Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont
> confidentiels et etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires.
> Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisee est interdite. 
> Tout message electronique est susceptible d'alteration. 
> La SOCIETE GENERALE et ses filiales declinent toute responsabilite au 
> titre de ce message s'il a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie.
> 				********
> This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and
> intended solely for the addressees.
> Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. 
> E-mails are susceptible to alteration.   
> Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates 
> shall be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. 
> 
> *************************************************************************
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users