[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [aspectj-users] AspectJ and JBoss AOP implementation
|
AspectJ introduces a new language (AspectJ) with new
keywords, compiler and stuff. (There's great IDE
support for AspectJ)
JBoss AOP is configured in XML.
What you think is easier to learn probably depends on
which you learn first and what you feel more
comfortable with.
I don't think that learning the implementation (JBoss,
AspectJ) is the hardest part. Think that really
appreciating the value of a new methodoloy / paradigm
is the hardest part. How long did it take you to fully
understand OOP????
Though you should always try to keep things simple,
simplicity doens't always imply quality!
Cheers,
Ruud
--- Gregor Kiczales <gregor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Arun Natarajan said:
>
> > Has someone recently evaluated AspectJ and the
> JBoss
> > implementation? I read some old papers talking
> about
> > the performance related issues with JBoss, but any
> > other differences? JBoss seems to be more easy to
> learn
> > than AspectJ.
>
> I've seen this said a number of times, that JBoss
> (and AspectWerkz)
> are easier to learn than AspectJ. And it shows up in
> various press
> articles, where people just repeat what others have
> said to them.
>
> But I know many people disagree -- that is, many
> people think AspectJ
> is easier to learn. So I'd like to ask (and perhaps
> start a discussion).
>
> Why do you say that JBoss seems easier to learn than
> AspectJ?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
