Re: [aspectj-users] Aspect Weaver

[Nicholas Lesiecki <ndlesiecki@xxxxxxxxx>]

The small test case and the decompiler output might be interesting to look
at. I'd suggest submitting this as a bug, but I'm not sure that it's
technically a bug with AspectJ. Perhaps someone on the AspectJ team can
comment on this issue?

Nick



On 11/4/03 9:32 AM, "DiFrango, Ron" <ron.difrango@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Nicholas/Trishan,
> 
> While it might be possible to de-compile most aspectj weaved code, I have
> found instances where the de-compilers do not properly work.  The most
> common case where I see this not working is when you have handler advice.
> None of the de-comipiler I tried, and I tried everyone I could find, they
> produced the same output.  If you know of a de-compiler that works on this
> please let me know.
> 
> If you want I can create a small test case to prove it out.  I also request
> this same thing as it is a nusance.  At the current time I can not find the
> archive on it, but I am certain I did report this.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ron
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicholas Lesiecki
> To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: 11/4/03 12:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] Aspect Weaver
> 
> Trishan,
> 
> The standard solution is to use a decompiler. Several free and
> commercial ones are available.
> 
> nick
> 
> On 11/3/03 9:21 PM, "Trishan de Lanerolle" <tlanerolle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> Thanks for the previous information on the use. One hurdle that we have
> come across is the changes made to version 1.1 from 1.0 where the byte
> code weaving was introduced.  We would like to see the weaved source
> code. We need to see the intermediate weaved code. Is there a command or
> option in 1.1.1 to do this. I am new to AspectJ and I appologise in
> advance if the answer is staring me in the face. If so this would
> eliminate a major hurdle. We are concerned about the code overhead the
> weaved code  adds on. Some of the project build time goes in to several
> hours and we hope that the introduced Aspects don't significantly add on
> to this.  We hope to test this out as well. Our architects want to see
> what effect the introduced point cuts and aspects have on the source
> code. Any advice would be appreciated.
> Thank you
> Trishan
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> Trishan de Lanerolle
> R&D Lead
> AOP Research Group
> SL ATC, Virtusa
> www.virtusa.com <http://www.virtusa.com/>
> tlanerolle@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
> you are hereby notified that your access is unauthorized, and any
> review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message including
> any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
> computer.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **************************************************************************
> The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only
> for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other
> use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
> please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users