Re: [aspectj-users] Combining AspectJ and MultiJava (multimethods)

[Jan Van Besien <Jan.VanBesien@xxxxxxxx>]

Wes Isberg wrote:
> I haven't read carefully, but the fix might be as simple
> as adding the aspectjrt.jar to your runtime classpath.

No, that didn't solve the problem.

> Can you tell us how MultiJava's declarations are better
> than using AspectJ?  I'm curious because the syntax
> looks identical, and AspectJ has the benefit of enforcing
> aspect-relative visibility.

I might have been to quick with conclusions. At first it seamed to me that 
MultiJava has more advanced ways of defining scoping (with an extended 
"import" statement) and encapsulation (protected methods). But I'm not 
sure if that solves some of the problems I discovered in AspectJ when 
introducing public methods with the same signature to objects...

I'm still experimenting with it, if I find something, I'll let you know ;-)

Jan Van Besien