Re: [aspectj-users] CNET News.com Article on AOP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [aspectj-users] CNET News.com Article on AOP

From: "Daniel F. Savarese" <dfs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:44:53 -0400
Delivered-to: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/aspectj-users/>
List-help: <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

In message <web-54853719@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Wes Isberg" writes:
>P.S. - Can we think of a better way to characterize
>AspectJ than "experimental"?  I'd think that a few
>years of research, patents, and a thriving community
>including many deployments in commercial contexts is
>something more than that.

trailblazing
trendsetting
canonical
established
well-tested
tried and true
de facto standard
practical
mature
proven
workhorse

References:
- Re: [aspectj-users] CNET News.com Article on AOP
  - From: Wes Isberg

Prev by Date: Re: [aspectj-users] Instance of aspect
Next by Date: Re: [aspectj-users] Instance of aspect
Previous by thread: Re: [aspectj-users] CNET News.com Article on AOP
Next by thread: Re: [aspectj-users] CNET News.com Article on AOP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs