RE: [aspectj-users] Parameters

["DiFrango, Ron" <ron.difrango@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Macneil,

Yes, I tried that variation execution foo(*) and it does not match anything.
Interesting side effect.

Thanks,

Ron DiFrango


-----Original Message-----
From: Macneil Shonle [mailto:mshonle@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:58 AM
To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] Parameters


> (Also, it's a doc bug that ".." in args(...) is not better documented. 
> I couldn't find it in either quick reference or the programming guide 
> semantics appendix; perhaps my search was bad.)

While the documentation for ".." is being worked on it would also be good to
point out that call(foo(*)) and call(foo(..)) match different functions (a
syntactic vinegar "gotcha") and the two shouldn't be confused.

Thanks,
Macneil


_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
 
**************************************************************************
The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only
for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other
use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.