| RE: [aspectj-users] ajdoc for 1.1 |
Hi Mark, Undecided on that one at the moment. I'm pretty busy and I'm still not comfortable with the correct way forward for the tool itself. I may get some time in the near future to work on this but at the moment its a bit 'when I can'. Cheers Russ On Thursday, July 31, 2003, at 03:50PM, Volkmann, Mark <Mark.Volkmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ><<Original Attached>>Title: RE: [aspectj-users] ajdoc for 1.1
Are you going to have to rewrite ajdoc from scratch?
Can you take a guess as to when you expect to release a version that works with AspectJ 1.1?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Miles [mailto:russellmiles@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 3:45 AM
> To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] ajdoc for 1.1
>
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> There is currently an effort underway that is looking at
> possible features for ajdoc and I am beginning to work out a
> supporting infrastructure from the different API's that
> currently exist in AspectJ. I'll post to this mailing list
> when I get 5 mins the ajdoc-like features I have got so far
> to get anyones input as to what they specifically would like
> to see supported by the tool and whether they can offer any
> advice or help on this.
>
> Cheers
>
> Russ Miles
>
> On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 10:48PM, Volkmann, Mark
> <Mark.Volkmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> ><<Original Attached>>
>
***********************************************************************************
WARNING: All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received or
otherwise recorded by the A.G. Edwards corporate e-mail system and is
subject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to,
someone other than the recipient.
************************************************************************************