[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-users] aspectjrt.jar name
|
Mark,
Cactus should almost certainly work just fine with 1.1 (as others have
pointed out). If not, please send me an email and I'll see what I can do
about it.
Cheers,
Nick
(Cactus commiter)
--- Ron Bodkin <rbodkin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I tried using Cactus with the aspectjrt.jar from 1.1 and it worked for
> me; it appears that aspectjrt.jar is backwards compatible.
>
> I don't think you can rename the jar file (at least when you compile the
> compiler checks for aspectjrt.jar on the classpath), and in any event it
> probably wouldn't help with any compatibility issues unless you have
> Cactus classes loading in a different classloader (i.e., if
> aspectjrt1.1.jar were before aspectjrt.jar on the classpath, Cactus would
> use the 1.1 classes).
>
>
> Ron Bodkin
> Chief Technology Officer
> New Aspects of Security
> m: (415) 509-2895
>
>
> ------------Original Message-------------
> From: "Volkmann, Mark" <Mark.Volkmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "'aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, Jul-28-2003 2:50 PM
> Subject: [aspectj-users] aspectjrt.jar name
> Does aspectjrt.jar have to be named that? I'd like to rename it to
> aspectjrt1.1.jar to avoid conflict with the version that Cactus uses, but
> when I do that, ajc reports that it can't find the JAR.
>
??***********************************************************************************?WARNING:
> All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received or?otherwise
> recorded by the A.G. Edwards corporate e-mail system and is?subject to
> archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to,?someone other
> than the
>
recipient.?************************************************************************************
>
