|
Mark,
I tried using Cactus with the aspectjrt.jar from 1.1 and it worked for me;
it appears that aspectjrt.jar is backwards compatible.
I don't think you can rename the jar file (at least when you compile the
compiler checks for aspectjrt.jar on the classpath), and in any event it
probably wouldn't help with any compatibility issues unless you have Cactus
classes loading in a different classloader (i.e., if aspectjrt1.1.jar were
before aspectjrt.jar on the classpath, Cactus would use the 1.1 classes).
Ron Bodkin
Chief Technology Officer
New Aspects of Security
m: (415) 509-2895
------------Original Message-------------
From: "Volkmann, Mark" <Mark.Volkmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, Jul-28-2003 2:50 PM
Subject: [aspectj-users] aspectjrt.jar name
Does aspectjrt.jar have to be named that? I'd like to rename it to aspectjrt1.1.jar to avoid
conflict with the version that Cactus uses, but when I do that,
ajc reports that it can't find the
JAR.
***********************************************************************************
WARNING:
All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received or
otherwise
recorded by the A.G. Edwards corporate e-mail system and is
subject to
archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to,
someone other than
the
recipient.
************************************************************************************
|
