Re: [aspectj-users] Re: Kudos, J2EE pointcuts, and Dynamic AOP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [aspectj-users] Re: Kudos, J2EE pointcuts, and Dynamic AOP

From: Bill de hÓra <bill@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 11:46:31 +0100
Delivered-to: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/aspectj-users/>
List-help: <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624



Cedric,


Cedric Beust wrote:

- they need to contain some proprietary cruft in order to exclude theconcrete implementations generated by the application server

Stupid question maybe. Why can't they be scoped to the applicationcode's package space, or alternatively, scoped to exclude the vendors'?


Bill de hÓra

References:
- [aspectj-users] Re: Kudos, J2EE pointcuts, and Dynamic AOP
  - From: Cedric Beust

Prev by Date: [aspectj-users] Re: Kudos, J2EE pointcuts, and Dynamic AOP
Next by Date: [aspectj-users] ANT-Task problem
Previous by thread: [aspectj-users] Re: Kudos, J2EE pointcuts, and Dynamic AOP
Next by thread: [aspectj-users] Re: Kudos, J2EE pointcuts, and Dynamic AOP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top