RE: [aspectj-users] More precedence

[isberg@xxxxxxxx]

It looks to me like 

  declare dominates : Super+, ...

is just broken now.  Anyone care to submit a bug?

Wes
------------- DominatesAdvice.java

public class DominatesAdvice {
    public static void main (String[] args) {
        new C().run();
    } 
    pointcut run() : target(C) && call(void run());
    static void log(String s) {
        System.out.println(""+s);
    }
}

class C { void run() {}}
class Super {}
aspect A extends Super {
    before () : DominatesAdvice.run() { 
        DominatesAdvice.log("A"); 
    }
}
aspect B {
    before () : DominatesAdvice.run() { 
        DominatesAdvice.log("B"); 
    }

aspect Dominates {
    declare dominates : Super+, B;  // BUG: produces B, A
    //declare dominates : A, B;  // ok: produces A, B
}


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lesiecki Nicholas [mailto:ndlesiecki@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 8:36 AM
> To: isberg@xxxxxxxx; aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: support@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [aspectj-users] More precedence
> 
> 
> Hello All,
> 
> Sorry, my message got truncated. Unfortunately I've left the 
> sample code at
> home. 
> 
> The upshot is that for:
> 
> declare dominates : Security+, *;
> 
> the precedence appears to be:
> 
> Tracing
> Notification
> MoreSecurity
> CustomSecurity
> Security (abstract)
> Security (a second time)
> (JoinPoint)
> 
> i.e. Security LAST.
> 
> For:
> 
> declare dominates : *Security*, *;
> 
> The order is:
> 
> MoreSecurity
> CustomSecurity
> Security (abstract)
> Security (a second time)
> Tracing
> Notification
> (JoinPoint)
> 
> i.e. Security FIRST.
> 
> Why should Security+ and *Security* produce different 
> results? They both
> (should) select the same set of Concrete aspects (CustomSecurity and
> MoreSecurity). Am I missing something?
> 
> BTW, the sample code is ridiculously simple. Each aspect has 
> a single piece
> of before advice that prints what it's doing to the console. 
> All of the
> advice affects call(void doSomething()). The only 
> doSomething() method in
> the compilation unit appears in SomeObject.
> 
> SomeObject's main:
> main(){
>   new SomeObject().doSomething();
> }
> 
> Cheers,
> nick
> --- isberg@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Did the mailing list clip this question?
> > Did you decide against it, after accidental send?
> > 
> > (btw, thanks for the bugs)
> > 
> > Wes
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Lesiecki Nicholas [mailto:	
> > > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 9:16 PM
> > > To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [aspectj-users] More precedence
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Ok, I have several aspects that affect a single join point. 
> > > They all define
> > > a single piece of before advice that prints a message about 
> > > what they're
> > > doing.
> > > 
> > > Aspects:
> > > 
> > > Security (abstract)
> > > |
> > > --CustomSecurity
> > > |
> > > --MoreSecurity
> > > 
> > > Tracing
> > > 
> > > Notification
> > > 
> > > I have the following declaration:
> > > 
> > > declare dominates : Security+, *;
> > > 
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> > > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > > 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
>