Re: [aspectj-dev] @Around advice and JoinPoint.EnclosingStaticPart

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [aspectj-dev] @Around advice and JoinPoint.EnclosingStaticPart

From: Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:40:06 -0800
Delivered-to: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/aspectj-dev>
List-help: <mailto:aspectj-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev>, <mailto:aspectj-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/aspectj-dev>, <mailto:aspectj-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

> My understanding is EnclosingStaticPart and ProceedingJoinPoint map to the caller and callee respectively.

For a call pointcut this would be true, but not for an execution pointcut. Enclosing currently means lexically enclosing, not dynamically - so for a call pointcut it is the call joinpoint and then the joinpoint within which the call is being made.

Andy

On 15 December 2012 00:52, Nick Keltke <nick.keltke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

My understanding is EnclosingStaticPart and
ProceedingJoinPoint map to the caller and callee respectively.

References:
- [aspectj-dev] @Around advice and JoinPoint.EnclosingStaticPart
  - From: Nick Keltke

Prev by Date: [aspectj-dev] @Around advice and JoinPoint.EnclosingStaticPart
Next by Date: [aspectj-dev] JAR files present in Manifest.mf is not considered in classpath
Previous by thread: [aspectj-dev] @Around advice and JoinPoint.EnclosingStaticPart
Next by thread: [aspectj-dev] JAR files present in Manifest.mf is not considered in classpath
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs