Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [aspectj-dev] Any researchers out there put time into invokedynamic interplay with AspectJ pointcuts?

Hi Eric,

Sure, raise a new bugzilla and we can take it from there.  If you can
help out on the implementation, that's awesome.

cheers,
Andy

On 24 November 2011 23:20, Eric Bodden
<bodden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Andy.
> Yes, I have given this some thought, but I do not have an
> implementation ready yet. I am happy to discuss a possible language
> design and implementation strategy (may even be able to commit some
> manpower). Should we open a bug report for this?
> Cheers,
> Eric
>
> On Wednesday, 23 November 2011, Andy Clement wrote:
>>
>> For full Java7 support, it is more than just allowing the new syntax,
>> we have to decide how AspectJ will treat invokedynamic.  I have some
>> ideas but have only put a few moments thought into it - I wondered if
>> anyone out there had put a bunch of thought into it and would like to
>> share their findings? or implementation :) !
>>
>> thanks,
>> Andy
>> _______________________________________________
>> aspectj-dev mailing list
>> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
>
> --
> Eric Bodden, Ph.D., http://bodden.de/
> Head of Secure Software Engineering Group at EC SPRIDE
> Principal Investigator in Secure Services at CASED
> Tel: +49 6151 16-75422    Fax: +49 6151 16-72051
> Room 3.2.14, Mornewegstr. 32, 64293 Darmstadt
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>


Back to the top