Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [aspectj-dev] Releases source code

Hmm, i only use eclipse to do the CVS work.  The releases tags all
have sensible names though:  V1_5_0 V1_5_1 so you can guess what you
want.  In Eclipse i can just 'show history' on files checked out and
see all the tags they are associated with.

On 07/03/2008, Marco D'Ambros <marco.dambros@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> sorry for the naive question... but to get the source from cvs I have to do
> something like:
>
> cvs -d "dev.eclipse.org:/cvsroot/tools" co aspectj -r <sticky tag name>
>
> But where can I get the list of sticky tags corresponding to the main
> releases?
>
> cheers and thanks
> Marco
>
>
>
> On Mar 7, 2008, at 2:48 AM, Andy Clement wrote:
> Take the version tagged V1_5_4 if you just want 1.5.4.  There are no
> more versions of 1.5 planned, 1.6 is the active development level now.
>  1.5.4 included quite a few generics problems because it was based on
> an old Eclipse 3.1 compiler, but if you want that version, take the
> V1_5_4 files.
>
> If you want 1.6.0m1 take the V1_6_0M1 version, or V1_6_0M2 for M2 or
> just HEAD for the current version of AspectJ6.
>
> Andy.
>
> On 06/03/2008, Martin Görg <nimoth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andy Clement wrote:
>
> HEAD is always clean, code is only committed when all 3600 tests pass.
>
>  Failing tests for existing bugs are commented out if committed.
>
> Actually, HEAD is better than AspectJ1.5.4 - so you might be better on
>
> the very latest - HEAD passes everything that 1.5.4 did plus all the
>
> new tests added since then.
>
>
> Interesting. But how do I differ between getting 1.6.x and 1.5.4? Is
>  that where the tags come in? What would be the best way to get the
>  most stable 1.5.4 source?
>
>
>
> On 06/03/2008, Martin Görg <nimoth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Haha, alright. I need something more stable to develop a tool for.
>
>  Another thing kind of fitting into this topic: The test should
>
>  normally all run fine, right? Or are the tests for open bugs also in
>
>  the repository and thus bound to fail?
>
>
>
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>
>  From: "Andy Clement" <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>  To: "Martin Görg" <nimoth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2008 1:54 AM
>
>  Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] Releases source code
>
>
>
>  I guess so - I've never gone back to check out a tagged version, we
>
>  only move forward ;)
>
>
>
>  On 06/03/2008, Martin Goerg <nimoth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> You say, they are not in branches, but file tags. Does that conform
>
>
>  to the 'versions' I can see when checking out with Eclipse CVS? For
>
>
>  example, I'm just now checking out the aspectj source. To get the
>
>
>  latest stable release, I selected version 1_5_4 from the repository.
>
>
>  Was that correct?
>
>
>
>
>
>  Thanks and Cheers
>
>
>
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>
>
>  From: "Andy Clement" <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>  To: "Martin Görg" <nimoth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>  Sent: Friday, March 7, 2008 12:22 AM
>
>
>  Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] Releases source code
>
>
>
>
>
>  I presume you have looked at the FAQ to get the CVS information.
>
>
>
>
>
>   How do I get and compile the source code for AspectJ?
>
>
> http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/faq.php#q:buildingsource
>
>
>
>
>
>  The tags are reasonably clear:  V1_5_0 V1_6_0 etc.  These are not in
>
>
>  branches, they are file tags.
>
>
>
>
>
>  Andy.
>
>
>
>
>
>  On 06/03/2008, Marco D'Ambros <marco.dambros@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Dear list,
>
>
>
>
>
>  I am Marco D'Ambros, a Phd student in the university of Lugano
>
>
>  Switzerland. I am working on techniques for bug prediction and I would
>
>
>  like to use AspectJ as a case study.
>
>
>  For that, I need the source code of the various releases of AspectJ,
>
>
>  but I was not able to find them on the website, or to find which
>
>
>  sticky tag I have to use to get them from the cvs repository.
>
>
>  Where can I find these pieces of information?
>
>
>
>
>
>  Thanks a lot!
>
>
>  Marco
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>
>
>  aspectj-dev mailing list
>
>
>  aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>
>
>  aspectj-dev mailing list
>
>
>  aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>
>
>  aspectj-dev mailing list
>
>
>  aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>
>  aspectj-dev mailing list
>
>  aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>
>  aspectj-dev mailing list
>
>  aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> aspectj-dev mailing list
>
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  aspectj-dev mailing list
>  aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>  aspectj-dev mailing list
>  aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
>


Back to the top