Re: [aspectj-dev] Aspectj 1.2.1 with java 1.5

[Ginés Collado <xginux@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi.

I'm ussing that version because it is running on an enterprise environment. 
In this environment is using this version. I will request the update to the 
1.5.3. version.

I understand that annotations and aspect are complementary.

Thanks for yours comments.

> From: "Dean Wampler" <deanwampler@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: AspectJ developer discussions <aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "AspectJ developer discussions" <aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] Aspectj 1.2.1 with java 1.5
> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 13:19:20 -0600
>
> Yes, an example of pointcuts defined using annotations exclusively is
> <shameless_plug> Contract4J </shameless_plug>. This approach is great
> for minimizing the coupling of pointcuts to classes and packages, by
> avoiding using names that are more likely to change.
>
> dean
>
> On 2/1/07, Ron Bodkin <rbodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Gines,
> >
> > Why are you using AspectJ 1.2.1 instead of a more recent version, like
> > 1.5.3, that includes much improved support for Java 1.5?
> >
> > Aspects are a great tool to use *with* annotations - several articles have
> > been written about this (e.g., by Gregor Kiczales, Ramnivas Laddad, and
> > Adrian Colyer) and I'm going to be presenting on using aspects to work 
> > with
> > annotations at TheServerSide Java Symposium this Spring...  To help build
> > intuition here, think about the best way to use annotations - to mark 
> > domain
> > concepts and exceptions to a rule. Aspects make it easy to process
> > domain-specific abstractions and to use defaults that are sensible for
> > *your* application...
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: aspectj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:aspectj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ginés Collado
> > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 7:13 AM
> > To: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [aspectj-dev] Aspectj 1.2.1 with java 1.5
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > I want ask you if someone knows any incompatibility with aspectj 1.2.1
> > running
> > in a 1.5 java environment.
> >
> > Do you have any experiences running this version of aspectj in a 1.5 java
> > environment.
> >
> > In the other hand, java 1.5 includes "annotations" functionalities. This 
> > new
> >
> > functionality can do unnecessary the use of aspectj?.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Bye.
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Dale rienda suelta a tu tiempo libre. Mil ideas para exprimir tu ocio con
> > MSN Entretenimiento. http://entretenimiento.msn.es/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-dev mailing list
> > aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-dev mailing list
> > aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
>
> --
> Dean Wampler
> http://www.objectmentor.com
> http://www.aspectprogramming.com
> http://www.contract4j.org
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev

_________________________________________________________________
Un amor, una aventura, compañía para un viaje. Regístrate gratis en MSN Amor 
& Amistad. http://match.msn.es/match/mt.cfm?pg=channel&tcid=162349