Re: [aspectj-dev] RC1 coming soon?

["Wes Isberg" <wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> There are also another
> 15 bugs when I choose versions 1.5.0M1~M4 and target milestone "---".

(Speaking while the UK is sleeping)

Generally Adrian and Andy set target milestones on the bugs, and
both have already said that we'll need to establish milestones on
new bugs.  With 80+ bugs already outstanding, that process can take some
time without delaying the release.  However, developers do get the bugs 
when they are written, and if a bug seems particularly important, 
a developer might start working on it before it even has a milestone.

Andy's/Adrian's main point is that we track distance-to-completion
based on the bugs, not on a plan, so that's your best indicator.
Adrian has already said that many bugs we'd hoped to get to in 1.5.0 
might be deferred to 1.5.1, in the interest of getting the release 
in the hands of users.

Wes

P.S. - all bugs default to P3. Sometimes we target a bug for a 
milestone but don't change the priority - e.g., there are some 
VerifyError bugs which should probably be P1 and are being treated
as such, but are recorded as P3 now.

> ------------Original Message------------
> From: Eduardo Rocha <eduardorochabr@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "AspectJ developer discussions" <aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, Oct-25-2005 2:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] RC1 coming soon?
>
> I have found why, it is because there is no "Target Milestone"
> assigned... who's responsible for assigning it? There are also another
> 15 bugs when I choose versions 1.5.0M1~M4 and target milestone "---".
> 
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=AspectJ&version=1.5.0M1&version=1.5.0M2&version=1.5.0M3&version=1.5.0M4&target_milestone=---&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
> 
> 2005/10/25, Alexandru Popescu <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > #: Eduardo Rocha changed the world a bit at a time by saying on  
> 10/25/2005 11:36 PM :#
> > > Andy,
> > >
> > > For example, why bug 112830 (
> > > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=112830 ) is not shown 
> is
> > > the list?
> > >
> >
> > Probably because it is P3? Not sure
> >
> > ./alex
> > --
> > .w( the_mindstorm )p.
> >
> >
> >
> > > Eduardo
> > >
> > > 2005/10/25, Alexandru Popescu 
> <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > >> #: Andy Clement changed the world a bit at a time by saying on  
> 10/25/2005 10:27 PM :#
> > >> > On 25/10/05, Alexandru Popescu 
> <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> >> #: Oliver Böhm changed the world a bit at a time by saying on  
> 10/25/2005 6:34 PM :#
> > >> >> > Hello,
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I guess the plan on http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/plans.php 
> is a
> > >> >> > little bit outdated (or I missed something;-) When I 
> extrapolate the
> > >> >> > dates correct RC1 will come soon and we can count on the 
> final version
> > >> >> > about midth of November. Is this realistic?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I ask because first I want to finalize my book and secondly I 
> manage
> > >> >> > the AspectJ Winter Camp at the beginning of December (8.-10., 
> see
> > >> >> > http://www.jugs.org/ajwc/) where I want to use both: the book 
> and
> > >> >> > AspectJ 5.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > regards
> > >> >> > Oliver
> > >> >> > --
> > >> >> > Oliver Böhm
> > >> >> > http://www.javatux.de
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Not sure where I have read it, but I remeber something about 
> Christmas final release :-).
> > >> >>
> > >> >> ./alex
> > >> >> --
> > >> >> .w( the_mindstorm )p.
> > >> >
> > >> > We just didn't say which christmas ...
> > >> >
> > >> > We are working 25hours a day to finish AspectJ5.  The best way 
> to
> > >> > measure progress towards completion is by tracking the bug 
> reports,
> > >> > this query:
> > >>
> > >> Should I understand that when working for AspectJ6 you will be 
> working 36 hours/day? :-).
> > >>
> > >> ./alex
> > >> --
> > >> .w( the_mindstorm )p.
> > >>
> > >> ps: your efforts are highly appreciated.
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > 
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=AspectJ&target_milestone=1.5.0&target_milestone=1.5.0+M2&target_milestone=1.5.0+M3&target_milestone=1.5.0+M4&target_milestone=1.5.0RC1&target_milestone=1.5.0RC2&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
> > >> >
> > >> > looks at all bugs targetted 1.5.0 (or its various milestone/rcs) 
> that
> > >> > are still open.  When this number gets to zero, AspectJ5 is 
> complete.
> > >> > A couple of weeks ago it showed ~100, today it shows ~80.  Some 
> of
> > >> > these bugs/enhancements are likely to be shelved for 1.5.1 but 
> many
> > >> > will be resolved (all P1s and P2s should definetly be resolved).
> > >> > Obviously new bugs are coming in all the time and we have to 
> evaluate
> > >> > all of them to see if they must be fixed for 1.5.0.  Basically, 
> track
> > >> > the bug reports.
> > >> >
> > >> > Andy.
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > aspectj-dev mailing list
> > >> > aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> aspectj-dev mailing list
> > >> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aspectj-dev mailing list
> > > aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-dev mailing list
> > aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>