[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [aspectj-dev] AspectJ Custom Attributes
- From: "Wes Isberg" <wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:51:04 -0700
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
That's more than your personal .57 rubles - the long-term
implications *are* critical.
Right now, the backwards compatibility we sign up to is stated here:
It doesn't include promising other tools that we won't change
our bytecode format. Fair warning is the best path at present.
> ------------Original Message------------
> From: Eugene Kuleshov <eu@xxxxxxxx>
> To: "AspectJ developer discussions" <aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, Oct-20-2005 12:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] AspectJ Custom Attributes
> I believe it is secure to say that AspectJ will be quite popular.
> So, one should take a serious look at the long term aspects of this
> issue untill it will be too late to get rid of the old luggage because
> it would affect backward compatibility with other tools...
> Just my 0.02 cents.
> Wes Isberg wrote:
> > This is a great discussion but I wouldn't consider it for the initial
> > AspectJ 5 release, not least because Andy said so *smile*. It might
> > also be good to see the population of conflicts/clients before
> > an approach. I'm sure ASM won't be the only one.
> > Wes
> >>------------Original Message------------
> >>From: Eugene Kuleshov <eu@xxxxxxxx>
> >>To: "AspectJ developer discussions" <aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>Date: Thu, Oct-20-2005 10:54 AM
> >>Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] AspectJ Custom Attributes
> >>Hi folks,
> >> It is good to see such discussion here and I would like to add few
> aspectj-dev mailing list