[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [aspectj-dev] AspectJ Custom Attributes
|
Hi Eugene,
That's more than your personal .57 rubles - the long-term
implications *are* critical.
Right now, the backwards compatibility we sign up to is stated here:
http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/next/devguide/compatibility.html
It doesn't include promising other tools that we won't change
our bytecode format. Fair warning is the best path at present.
Thanks,
Wes
> ------------Original Message------------
> From: Eugene Kuleshov <eu@xxxxxxxx>
> To: "AspectJ developer discussions" <aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, Oct-20-2005 12:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] AspectJ Custom Attributes
>
> Wes,
>
> I believe it is secure to say that AspectJ will be quite popular.
> So, one should take a serious look at the long term aspects of this
> issue untill it will be too late to get rid of the old luggage because
> it would affect backward compatibility with other tools...
>
> Just my 0.02 cents.
>
> Eugene
>
>
> Wes Isberg wrote:
> > This is a great discussion but I wouldn't consider it for the initial
> > AspectJ 5 release, not least because Andy said so *smile*. It might
> > also be good to see the population of conflicts/clients before
> adopting
> > an approach. I'm sure ASM won't be the only one.
> >
> > Wes
> >
> >
> >>------------Original Message------------
> >>From: Eugene Kuleshov <eu@xxxxxxxx>
> >>To: "AspectJ developer discussions" <aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>Date: Thu, Oct-20-2005 10:54 AM
> >>Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] AspectJ Custom Attributes
> >>
> >>Hi folks,
> >>
> >> It is good to see such discussion here and I would like to add few
>
> >>comments.
> ...
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>