[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-dev] Re: Changing the class hierarchy
|
Hi. I'm swamped in generics, so if you have time to raise an AspectJ
bug for this, I won't forget to look at it when I get a chance...
Andy.
On 07/10/05, Alessandro Di Bella <aldib@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Please see my comments below.
>
> Alessandro
>
>
> > Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 10:03:08 +0100
> >From: Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] Changing the class hierarchy
> > To: AspectJ developer discussions <aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Message-ID: <689d61aa0510070203x50a00871l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > What constructors are defined in the OntClassImpl class?
> You can see the constructors from
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jena/jena2/src/com/hp/hpl/jena/ontology/impl/OntClassImpl.java?view=markup
> > In order for
> > the declare parents to succeed, it needs to modify super calls within
> > any ctors in the targetted class (OntClassImpl). It does a number of
> > checks to verify what you want to introduce into the hierarchy is
> > allowed. However, the ability to binary weave declare parents
> > 'extends' is a recent addition to AspectJ (for a long time we only
> > supported extends if done with all source) - and it looks like you've
> > found a bug. Is there any way you could do an all source compile and
> > see what error gets reported?
> I did what you asked and i got no errors from the compiler and no error from
> the test. It looks to me like there is a problem with binary weave.
>
> If I can be of any help, please let me know.
>
> >
> > Andy.
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
