Re: [aspectj-dev] Problems with LTW in AJDT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [aspectj-dev] Problems with LTW in AJDT

From: Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:31:18 +0100
Delivered-to: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=n9c6FH+6p3fXk+kvdZQOu0y4Ix5UuCc/yFqCMk6vwIpFJOcYYaCKJjO/9fKsX3mAEEOqjVRylu2qDhTDCWKgM8+jMuk8KUUl6i01zoXLIZfR1ZkdjPbVzwIhDYhxJoJyniMFrdhtp93mgIch+mC1yXUXPF1BTM8rL6wMRF13D8c=
List-archive: <http://eclipse.org/pipermail/aspectj-dev>
List-help: <mailto:aspectj-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev>, <mailto:aspectj-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev>, <mailto:aspectj-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

There are some naughty AJ builds lately that incorrectly include
AspectJ weaver code in 1.5 bytecode format.  These issues are being
resolved - we always want to target consumers on 1.3 VMs whilst we
can.

Andy.

(Working on the cutting edge -> expect to bleed a little...)

References:
- RE: [aspectj-dev] Problems with LTW in AJDT
  - From: Ron Bodkin

Prev by Date: RE: [aspectj-dev] Problems with LTW in AJDT
Next by Date: [aspectj-dev] Possible AJ change: Read this if you use package (default) visible abstract ITDs?
Previous by thread: RE: [aspectj-dev] Problems with LTW in AJDT
Next by thread: RE: [aspectj-dev] Problems with LTW in AJDT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs