[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[List Home]
|
RE: [aspectj-dev] Cflow context exposure and hard references
|
- From: Eric Bodden <eric@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:20:59 +0200
- Delivered-to: aspectj-dev@eclipse.org
- Organization: RWTH Aachen University
- Thread-index: AcWYXQmTpc0feTfXTS+d17T0EdjDjAAomX3Q
Wes Isberg wrote:
> Hi Eric -
>
> You're suggesting that an executing object (target) in the current
> stack would be garbage collected?
>
> I'm not sure a reference obtained via this, target, or args would
> ever be garbage collected absent cflow. (I believe the operand stack
> is the same even when arguments are unused, but couldn't find
> anything on point.)
That's a valid point. I would hardly make sense to have those objects GCed.
However, I could not find anything that would explicitly describe this
behaviour.
Eric
--
Eric Bodden
Chair I2 for Programming Languages and Program Analysis
RWTH Aachen University