[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-dev] cvs info - correct?
|
#: the mind was *winged* after Alexandre Vasseur said on 6/13/2005 8:39 AM :#
> Hi
>
> If you refer to "AJ5" as the thing that contains the "annotation
> style", as I presume since you refer the branch the answer is no/no.
> Note that AJ5 is much more than "annotation style".
>
> @style is now in regular cvs head
> it has not yet surfaced in a milestone but it is probably included -
> to some extend - in the latest published stable builds.
> Alex
>
Thanks Alex. I am talking 'bout the merger result ;-). I thought it is called aj5 or @aj, but I may
be completely wrong.
:alex |.::the_mindstorm::.|
> On 6/12/05, Alexandru Popescu <alexandru.popescu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have missed the lately activity on AJ [sad/]. I would like to ask you the following: (sorry if
>> they where answered in the near past, but I couldn't find it):
>>
>> 1/ did AJ5 has a stable build available for download?
>> 2/ this CVS info is still correct:
>> depot: dev.eclipse.org:/home/technology
>> branch: AspectJ5_Development
>>
>> Many thanks for you answers,
>> :alex |.::the_mindstorm::.|
>> _______________________________________________
>> aspectj-dev mailing list
>> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
