Re: [aspectj-dev] eclipse 3.1m6 has rudimentary API enforcement

[Jim Bethancourt <jimbethancourt@xxxxxxxxx>]

Maybe the AJDT team could provide a tool for Eclipse that would
provide the same functionality (as part of AJDT) in the Preference
page or something along those lines.  Just an idea. :-)

Jim

On Apr 5, 2005 6:38 PM, Mik Kersten <beatmik@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Good question.  I imagine that to consider pushing this into Eclipse first
> someone from our user base would need to request this as a feature and
> describe how it's better than using declare error/warning, then AJDT would
> need to implement the prototype, and finally we could suggest it as an
> Eclipse feature.  I'm not sure about the utility of using pointcuts for this
> yet, and worry about it feeling like yet another complicated project setting
> being buried deep in a preference page.
> 
> But in general I like the idea of the pointcut language percolating out into
> other tools such as access static checkers, profilers, and debuggers.  Those
> tools rely on expressing static and dynamic conditions, and using pointcuts
> for that should be a lot easier than having a whole bunch of patterns and
> wildcards.
> 
> Mik
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: aspectj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-dev-
> > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Bethancourt
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 1:41 PM
> > To: AspectJ developer discussions
> > Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] eclipse 3.1m6 has rudimentary API enforcement
> >
> > Might it be possible to suggest to the Eclipse team that they could
> > make use of the AspectJ libraries, or would that not be a good idea?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jim
> >
> > On Apr 5, 2005 3:36 PM, Oli B. <boehm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > one question to 3.1M6: does the actual AJDT build works with it? On the
> > > download page is mentioned "3.1M5a only"?
> > >
> > > regards
> > > Oliver
> > >
> > > Mik Kersten wrote:
> > > > Note that Eclipse 3.1m6 has added some rudimentary support for access
> > > > rules that let you do a similar thing to declare error/warning.  This
> > > > sort of IDE feature could work better with the pointcut language than
> > > > with the wildcard patterns they support.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *Access rules on libraries and projects*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Access rules can be defined on referenced libraries and projects so as
> > > > to explicitly allow/disallow/discourage access to specific types.
> > > >
> > > > picture of Build path wizard with access rules
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From:
> > > > http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.1M6-
> > 200504011645/eclipse-news-all-M6.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mik
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://kerstens.org/mik
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > aspectj-dev mailing list
> > > > aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
> > >
> > > --
> > > Oliver Böhm
> > > http://www.javatux.de
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aspectj-dev mailing list
> > > aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-dev mailing list
> > aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>