[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [aspectj-dev] Still the dummy variables...
|
Eric, your original reply was correct. My email recast Rodrigo's
original language proposal by special-casing "this" in type patterns.
That proposal hasn't been submitted as a bug/rfe, no less implemented.
Wes
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/aspectj-dev/msg01363.html
> ------------Original Message------------
> From: Eric Bodden <eric@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "'AspectJ developer discussions'" <aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, Mar-28-2005 10:45 PM
> Subject: RE: [aspectj-dev] Still the dummy variables...
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hups, sorry. I should have read Wes' reply. Apparently one *can* use
> "this" under certain circumstances. Just another one of the
> per-use-case inconsistencies... ;-)
>
> Anyway: What you are looking for has been implemented I think: It's
> called LogicAJ. I saw a demo on the AOSD and it looked very much like
> what you are asking for. It's definetely more expressive than AJ's
> pattern matching. You should have a look at it.
>
> http://roots.iai.uni-bonn.de/research/logicaj/
>
> Eric
>
> - --
> Eric Bodden
> Chair I2 for Programming Languages and Program Analysis
> RWTH Aachen University
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 8.0.3
>
> iQA/AwUBQkj5nswiFCm7RlWCEQIPhQCfXynzvIeLeNrgGnXDrLZYRL3rxL8AoLXM
> YJP/UbSPdwbQUAysGxOB1Cgm
> =9EdE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
