[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [aspectj-dev] perJoinPoint
|
Ron Bodkin said:
>
> For what's it's worth, you were able to implement this
> capability by writing an ITD on StaticPart, and weaving
> that into aspectjrt.jar.
Wow, a meta-level aspect.
Now I'll have a real-world example to give when people ask!
> On Behalf Of Ramnivas Laddad
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 9:24 AM
> To: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] perJoinPoint
>
> I too have come across the same need. In my case, I wanted to store
> profile information per-join point (static part).
> While using hashmaps works, it is inefficient in many situations.
>
> A form of per-association will work (and JBoss AOP has such aspect
> association)
> Actually, there may be need for two kinds of associations:
> perJoinPointStaticPart and perJoinPoint.
> While these new aspect associations might work, I have a simpler
> proposal to address the need.
> I will like to add the following APIs:
>
> void JoinPoint.StaticPart.setUserObject(Object)
> Object JoinPoint.StaticPart.getUserObject()
>
> And, for symmetry,
>
> void JoinPoint.setUserObject(Object)
> Object JoinPoint.getUserObject()
>
> Then I will be able to store profile information as follows:
>
> Object around() : profiled() {
> long startTime = getTime();
> Object ret = proceed();
> long endTime = getTime();
>
> ProfileInfo jpStats =
> (ProfileInfo)thisJoinPointStaticPart.getUserObject();
> if(jpStats == null) {
> thisJoinPointStaticPart.setUserObject(new ProfileInfo());
> }
> jpStats.record(endTime-startTime);
> }
>
> Just submitted an enhancement request:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=89009
>
> -Ramnivas
>
> Eric Bodden wrote:
>
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >No, this is not easily possible at the moment (see the perobjects
> >discussion we had earlier). One workaround would be to store the
> >joinpoint-specifc state in a hashmap. I think you can even use an
> >identity hashmap, since joinpoints are pooled IIRC.
> >
> >Of course for large problems you might accumulate quite a lot of
> >state over the runtime. But this is more a general problem rather
> >than specific to AspectJ.
> >
> >Eric
> >
> >- --
> >Eric Bodden
> >Chair I2 for Programming Languages and Program Analysis
> >RWTH Aachen University
> >
> >
> >
> >________________________________
> >
> >From: aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >[mailto:aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tavoda Pavel
> >Sent: Donnerstag, 24. März 2005 11:58
> >To: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: [aspectj-dev] perJoinPoint
> >
> >
> >Is it possible to achieve something like perJoinPoint aspect?
> >I would like to calculate some statistics for method execution.
> >
> >TNX
> >
> >Pavel
> >
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >Version: PGP 8.0.3
> >
> >iQA/AwUBQkKl7MwiFCm7RlWCEQL2gACfRjf4bEHO5IKGHTID3EZeQwi1chMAoJOW
> >ps0sDujWkuwzpDLcv0SMvf1T
> >=rpcS
> >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >aspectj-dev mailing list
> >aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>