RE: [aspectj-dev] Re: Outcomings or not-outcomings of the perobjects BOF

[Eric Bodden <eric@xxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Enrique J. Amodeo Rubio wrote:
> I would like to know about your opinion about this kind of changes.
> I can understand that it could involve major reengineering and be
> deferred to later versions, but I'll like to know if there will be
> changes in AspectJ to allow more complex aspect associations and
> how difficult they are.
Thanks for your comment on this. Actually I found your approach
pretty reasonable. It looks indeed quite natural to me. However I am
pretty much sure, that the respriction to *static* inner aspects was
done by purpose. Maybe one of the developers may comment on this. I
am sure there are implementation issues involved.

Meanwhile I got a really very cool solution by one of the developers
of CaesarJ, which allows for explicit aspect deployment. See my blog
for details. Maybe that could give some inspirations...

Eric

- -- 
Eric Bodden
Chair I2 for Programming Languages and Program Analysis
RWTH Aachen University

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQkAWKswiFCm7RlWCEQJrgwCaAyOb5tOrg78H8Y9p+lmheVgmZvgAoKrF
btC8GB4Zlc2w3WwGNHVBcySL
=7U01
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----