[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-dev] @AspectJ Style and "declare annotation" (was: [aspectj-users] AspectJ and AspectWerkz to join forces)
|
Ramnivas did cover this issue on his JavaOne 2004 session.
That s indeed a sort of chicken and egg problem but to some extend the
same can arise when you match on ITDs.
You can find it there
http://javaoneonline.mentorware.net/servlet/mware.servlets.StudentServlet?mwaction=showDescr&class_id=27775&fromtopic=By%20Topic&subsysid=2000&topic=technical&avail_frames=true
(http://ramnivas.com/earlierTalks.html)
Alex
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:21:24 +0100, Eric Bodden <eric@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> First of all: Congratulations! I am really seeing some powerful
> synergy effects here.
>
> A question that arised for me when reading your article on
> Eclipse.org, was:
>
> When in the future pointcuts and pieces of advice can be declared as
> such by using annotations (the "@AspectJ style") and on the other
> hand, we have things like the "declare annotation" feature, will that
> mean that one would be able to declare pointcuts etc. using "declare
> annotation" as well? And would one be able to match on such
> annotations, too? And if so, could that not lead to interesting
> things like "circular declarations" or similar? Seems powerful for
> me, but also like a good chance, to mess some things up ;-)
>
> Eric
>
> - --
> Eric Bodden
> Chair I2 for Programming Languages and Program Analysis
> RWTH Aachen University
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 8.0.3
>
> iQA/AwUBQe7rc8wiFCm7RlWCEQJ0pgCeOofLMVtqHB5U4A4tPIrzutu5AngAnjkE
> WvbjBH1TYoa3lbqzp4xi59Hw
> =a8m9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
