RE: [aspectj-dev] execution(Foo.bar(int) && args(i)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

RE: [aspectj-dev] execution(Foo.bar(int) && args(i)?

From: Eric Bodden <eric@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:00:57 +0200
Delivered-to: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/aspectj-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:aspectj-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev>, <mailto:aspectj-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev>, <mailto:aspectj-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: RWTH Aachen University
Sensitivity: Private
Thread-index: AcSmOUEbvR9T6omBQ4aN0nloId0vvAAATiiQAACw8OA=

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Erik Hilsdale wrote:
> This pointcut always picks out zero join points, since join point
> kinds are 
> exclusive:  there is no join point that is both a call and an
> execution join point. 
Hi and thanks for the quick reply. I simply wasn't aware, that they
are exclusive.

Cheers,
Eric

- --
Eric Bodden
Chair I2 for Programming Languages and Program Analysis
RWTH Aachen University 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQVrcOcwiFCm7RlWCEQL6PgCeI58nKi8k6e2C+VZrMbE2Eq8n6yYAoMx0
mewmLWILciVrvGixTq6mFJZJ
=DBBm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- RE: [aspectj-dev] execution(Foo.bar(int) && args(i)?
  - From: Erik Hilsdale

Prev by Date: Re: [aspectj-dev] execution(Foo.bar(int) && args(i)?
Next by Date: [aspectj-dev] Extending test harness to include "fork" for run command
Previous by thread: RE: [aspectj-dev] execution(Foo.bar(int) && args(i)?
Next by thread: Re: [aspectj-dev] execution(Foo.bar(int) && args(i)?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs