Re: [aspectj-dev] org.aspectj.abc

[Matt Chapman <MCHAPMAN@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Adrian Colyer wrote on 20/08/2004 11:36:54:
> The 'official' answer is that I don't want to get into the game of 
leasing 
> sub-parts of the org.aspectj domain. Traditionally package names follow 
> internet domain names and imply ownership & authorship of the code by 
that 
> organisation - so "org.aspectj..*" means code written by the aspectj 
> project. In this situation this would not be the case. So for these two 
> reasons, and especially if you intend to publish the package for 
> consumption outside of your group, I'd prefer it if you used a package 
> name beginning e.g. ac.ox.aspectj.abc... (or ca.mcgill.aspectj.abc..) - 
I 
> see your dilemma ;). 

Another option might be to pick a package name like org.aspectbench and 
then
if you wanted to officially reserve it, simply register the 
aspectbench.org
domain name.

Just a suggestion,

Matt.