[aspectj-dev] RE: PerTarget - Bug or missunderstanding? was: [aspectj-de

[Eric Bodden <eric@xxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

gyula.kun-szabo@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Your original pertarget-argument pointcut (pushPop()) does not pick
> the field settings. 
Thanks a lot, that was exactly it.
 
> This makes me think if a warning could be emitted by the compiler
> in cases where the aspect contains advices whose pointcuts are not
> picked up by the pertarget argument expression.  
Indeed, I agree. I set up a feature request to see, what people
think.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=71866

Eric

- -- 
Eric Bodden
Chair I2 for Programming Languages and Program Analysis
RWTH Aachen University

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQRt4pswiFCm7RlWCEQInywCeLtEG7rAccVqh/7ldy8LmCmCTnAUAoLy2
kutHmnnMPe6fJW5J5936sNB3
=TxWt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----