[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-dev] Stateful JoinPoints
|
"David" == David J Pearce <d.pearce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
David> Well, the idea would be only to permit such state if the client
David> in question explicitly requested it - e.g. by overriding the
David> JoinPoint.StaticPart class.
Are you suggesting that such overriding be allowed on a per-class/interface
basis?
If not, that would seem to present a possible barrier to the reuse of classes
across applications: one class might want one kind of derived static part,
while a different class might want another.
If so, one might imagine other difficulties. For instance, if AspectJ allowed
derived static part objects on a per-interface basis, what should AspectJ do
for a class that implements two interfaces that request different derived
static part objects?
Eric.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Eide <eeide@xxxxxxxxxxx> . University of Utah School of Computing
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~eeide/ . +1 (801) 585-5512 voice, +1 (801) 581-5843 FAX
