I think that this presentation is good
for people to see. It’s a concrete study which demonstrates that
our performance story is sound, and that more engineering will result in further
improvements. Should we link Jeff’s
work from our site/faq?
Mik
From:
discuss-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:discuss-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Bodden
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 12:12 AM
To: 'Pan-Wei Ng';
discuss@xxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [aosd-discuss]
Performance Studies on AspectJ
You might want to have a look at http://bodden.de/aop.zip - a paper Jeff Dalton published
during summer work @ IBM Hursley. It's a comparison hand coded code vs.
aspected code.
Eric
--
Eric Bodden
Aachen University of Technology (RWTH)
ICQ UIN: 12656220
Website: http://www.bodden.de
PGP key: http://www.bodden.de/pub_key.asc
From:
discuss-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:discuss-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pan-Wei Ng
Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2004 18:54
To: discuss@xxxxxxxx
Subject: [aosd-discuss]
Performance Studies on AspectJ
Any performance studies on AspectJ to show
potential adopters that performance is not a worry?
Is there any effort to make AspectJ into
JSR or into some standard. Folks who are building large systems would need to
be convinced about the longevity of AspectJ
