RE: [aspectj-dev] Call for Vote: Commit rights for Andy Clement on Aspec

["Mik Kersten" <beatmik@xxxxxxxxx>]

+1

I started working with Andy on AJDT exactly 2 years ago, and have been
consistently impressed with his output.  He has developed a good
understanding of the AspectJ implementation, and been very effective at
developing the AJDT tool support around a rapidly evolving implementation.
He quickly learned to stop complaining about our lack of documentation, and,
as Erik would say, "use the source Luke".  It will be great to have him
officially under the tool API boundary!

Mik 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Wes Isberg
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 1:00 PM
> To: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] Call for Vote: Commit rights for Andy Clement
> on AspectJ project?
> 
> +1
> 
> Erik Hilsdale wrote:
> 
> > +1
> >
> > (Heck, he dealt with LocalVariableGen and the hashing/ordering problems
> therein... *smile*)
> >
> > -erik
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-dev-
> admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Adrian Colyer
> > Sent: Thursday, 15 January, 2004 11:36 am
> > To: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [aspectj-dev] Call for Vote: Commit rights for Andy Clement on
> AspectJ project?
> >
> >
> >
> > In accordance with our Eclipse project charter
> (http://www.eclipse.org/technology/technology-charter.html), I propose
> that Andy
> > Clement be granted commit rights on the AspectJ project, and call for a
> vote from the existing committers on this matter.The case
> > for granting Andy Clement commit rights on the AspectJ project is set
> out below.
> >
> > If you are in favour please respond by voting '+1'
> > If you are in opposition, please respond by voting '-1'
> > You may abstain by voting '0'.
> >
> > This vote is for existing committers on the AspectJ project only.
> >
> > Andy Clement has been affiliated with the AspectJ project for nearly two
> years now. His involvement started as a user, and quickly
> > progressed to contributing to the development of the AJDT tools in
> Eclipse (Andy is an existing committer on the AJDT project). Work
> > on AJDT has given Andy a good understanding of the ajde module in the
> AspectJ project. Over the last few months, Andy has been
> > increasingly involved in the development and maintenance of the AspectJ
> project itself, broadening his knowledge to cover much more
> > of the system. The evidence for Andy's contributions can be found in the
> bugzilla database.
> >
> > I would like to draw your attention to the following bug records which
> Andy has helped to resolve through his contributions in the
> > last few months:
> >
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=39479.  A critical P2 bug:
> NPE in bcel.LazyMethodGen when delegating from one ctor
> > t...
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=41536.  A P2 bug: Debug
> information getting lost in weaver ?
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=46750.  A P2 bug: "declare
> soft" inside nested aspect does not work
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=48522.  A P2 bug: Declare
> soft softening other exception types
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=39470.  A P2 bug:
> Repeating a compilation multiple times produces class files that
> > vary in size
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=43033.  A P3 bug: Compiler
> crash in ajc head (post 1.1.1 rc1) on erroneous ...
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=45663. A P3 bug:
> RecoveredMethod.java:391
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=47754. A P3 bug: illegal
> method modifier
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=46671 A P3 bug: ajc throws
> NullPointerException when parsing pointcut specification.
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=49814. A P4 bug:
> ConfigParser.java:132
> >
> > I believe Andy's long standing involvement with the project and the
> evidence of good quality contributions to the source code
> > warrant the granting of commit rights. If these rights are granted, Andy
> will continue to perform analysis of bug and enhancement
> > requests for AspectJ, and contribute fixes to the ajde, ajdt.core and
> weaver modules (and potentially others as the occasion
> > demands). We place in Andy the trust to make these enhancements via a
> patch sent to the module owner rather than a direct commit in
> > his own right on any occasion where he is not certain of the correctness
> of a proposed change.
> >
> > Regards, Adrian.
> >
> > -- Adrian
> > Adrian_Colyer@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-dev mailing list
> > aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev