Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [aspectj-dev] RE: [ajdt-dev] AJDT Integration Problem

Title: Message

There is currently no Ant task for AJBrowser.  If you want to make one you just need to invoke org.aspectj.ajde.ajbrowser.Main.  It takes “.lst” files as parameters.  If you make it and think that it would be useful to others you could contribute it by submitting a bugzilla patch.

 

Mik

 


From: aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of DiFrango, Ron
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 3:57 PM
To: 'aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'
Cc: ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Mik,

 

Thanks for the update.  I am glad to see you are looking at incorporating this change.  Please let me know if I can be of any assistance, like testing, etc.

 

As a side note, can you launch the browser (that works for me) from ANT?  If so is it documented any where as I can not seem to find it.

Thanks,

Ron DiFrango

-----Original Message-----
From: Mik Kersten [mailto:beatmik@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:47 AM
To: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [aspectj-dev] RE: [ajdt-dev] AJDT Integration Problem

Hi Ron,

 

Improving the memory footprint of the IDE support will happen when we integrate AJDT more tightly with the Eclipse's structure model.  We're starting on that this week.

 

Here is a short-term solution that can make it into the 1.1.1 release.  We could add an AJDT option that prevented the structure model from being built.  This way you could control the memory tradeoff between seeing the structure info and minimizing memory use.  You'd still get better compile performance, memory use, and integration than from launching an ant task.  I'll add this note to the bug report and plan it for 1.1.1.

 

Regards,

 

Mik

 


From: aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of DiFrango, Ron
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:20 PM
To: 'ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Cc: 'aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'

 

All,

 

I have submitted bug report #40764 on this issue.  In my very humble opinion this type of bug could slow the adoption of aspectj because as groups like the one I work in are slow to create too many aspect's as it hard to "see" which aspects are affecting the source code base.

Thanks,

Ron DiFrango

-----Original Message-----
From: DiFrango, Ron
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:50 AM
To: 'ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Cc: 'aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [ajdt-dev] AJDT Integration Problem

Folks,

This email is in reference to a previous one I sent out regarding large projects and AJDT.  The ling to the entire thread can be found at:

        http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/aspectj-dev/msg00331.html

Per Wes's request, I attempted to use the ajbrowser (via ajbrowser.bat), after much setup with class path's etc. I was able to get it to work with if I specified that I use 384MB of memory.  But if I try to get this same project working in AJDT it fails miserably (again see the link the thread above).

Now the question is to I submit a bug report on this?  If so do I do so against the AJDT?

Thanks,

Ron DiFrango

                                **************************************************************************          The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.

************************************************************************** The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.

************************************************************************** The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.


Back to the top