Mik,
Thanks
for the update. I am glad to see you are looking at incorporating this
change. Please let me know if I can be of any assistance, like testing,
etc.
As a
side note, can you launch the browser (that works for me) from ANT? If so
is it documented any where as I can not seem to find it.
Thanks,
Ron DiFrango
Hi
Ron,
Improving the memory
footprint of the IDE support will happen when we integrate AJDT more tightly
with the Eclipse's structure model. We're starting on that this
week.
Here is a short-term
solution that can make it into the 1.1.1 release. We could add an AJDT
option that prevented the structure model from being built. This way you
could control the memory tradeoff between seeing the structure info and
minimizing memory use. You'd still get better compile performance,
memory use, and integration than from launching an ant task. I'll add
this note to the bug report and plan it for 1.1.1.
Regards,
Mik
From:
aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of DiFrango, Ron Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:20
PM To:
'ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Cc:
'aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'
I have submitted bug
report #40764 on this issue. In my very humble opinion this type of
bug could slow the adoption of aspectj because as groups like the one I
work in are slow to create too many aspect's as it hard to "see" which aspects
are affecting the source code base.
Thanks,
Ron DiFrango
-----Original
Message----- From:
DiFrango, Ron Sent:
Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:50 AM To:
'ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Cc:
'aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: [ajdt-dev] AJDT Integration
Problem
Folks,
This email is in reference to a
previous one I sent out regarding large projects and AJDT. The ling to
the entire thread can be found at:
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/aspectj-dev/msg00331.html
Per Wes's request, I attempted
to use the ajbrowser (via ajbrowser.bat), after much setup with class path's
etc. I was able to get it to work with if I specified that I use 384MB of
memory. But if I try to get this same project working in AJDT it fails
miserably (again see the link the thread above).
Now the question is to I submit
a bug report on this? If so do I do so against the AJDT?
Thanks,
Ron DiFrango
**************************************************************************
The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only
for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other
use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from your
computer.
**************************************************************************
The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only
for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of
this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of,
or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact
the sender and delete the material from your
computer.
************************************************************************** The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.
|