[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: commit rules for 1.1final release (was: RE: [aspectj-dev] Problems getting 'non-incremental' to work in AJDT)
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]
. . .
> > Once we get beyond 1.1.0, we should look at fencing the relevant
> portions
> > of ajde in with some clearly defined test-cases and interfaces, and then
> > take a step back and think through the design of ajde to fully support
> > incremental.
>
> This sounds right, although the fencing might be difficult.
>
> One option is to go the heavy-duty eclipse integration route of modifying
> jdt.core and jdt.ui to provide the needed functionality while trying to
> maintain all of the existing java functionality. The compiler has been
> designed to make that as easy as possible and making this really work
> might be the most effective use of people's time. I'd be happy to join a
> discussion about what this might look like after 1.1final.
I agree. Eclipse has already done a great job of incremental (and eager)
model building. Hopefully we will be able to save ourselves a lot of time
by figuring out how to extend that to understand crosscutting rather than
rebuilding the whole thing.
Mik