README-1.1 - was Re: [aspectj-dev] (no subject)

[Wes Isberg <wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

It would be nice to have a description of changes from 1.0 to 1.1,
for those just making the move.  Do you think the porting guide 
section "Porting pre-1.1 code to AspectJ 1.1" is sufficient and 
correct?

Wes

P.S. - 
It might also be nice to list language features that didn't make it,
to inform further discussion.  That seems like an html file in the
tree for developers, perhaps linked from the FAQ.  Entries there
could graduate to RFE status in the bug database if they find a
sponsor.

hilsdale@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > - more doc updates for actual 1.1 language/technology?
> 
> I just finished updating the programming guide and quick reference -- all the README-11 info should now be in the documentation proper.  With that in mind, I'm planning to remove README-11.html from the distribution and fold its contents into changes.html.  Since this is a global build change I thought I'd let people know, but I don't expect anyone to really kvetch about it.
> 
> The only cool thing I did was turn the quick reference sideways and give it normal margins so normal human beings can print it.  And, for our friends with sensible paper sizes, there's now an A4 version of the quick reference (modules/docs/dist/doc/quickA4.pdf).  Enjoy.
> 
> -erik
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev