RE: [aspectj-dev] iajc bootclasspath attribute in ant

["Mik Kersten" <beatmik@xxxxxxx>]

I agree.  I've submitted it to Bugzilla as an "enhancement" and assigned it
to myself.

Mik

> -----Original Message-----
> From: aspectj-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-users-
> admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim.Hugunin@xxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 11:25 AM
> To: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx; aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> ajc accepts both -bootclasspath and -extdirs options and handles them
> correctly.  The command-line help message doesn't include these two
> options and should be fixed.  Having the ant task accept these seems
> completely right and compatible with the compiler.
> 
> There is an interesting dev question here that should probably be
> continued on the dev list.  Currently the code for bootclasspath and
> extdirs is in org.aspectj.ajdt.ajc.BuildArgParser.  Maybe that should be
> moved to AjBuildConfig so that it could be shared by the ant tasks and
> possibly by other clients.
> 
> -Jim
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wes Isberg [mailto:wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 8:56 AM
> > To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [aspectj-dev] Re: [aspectj-users] iajc bootclasspath attribute
> in
> > ant
> >
> > update (and reversal of sorts):
> >
> > I updated the ant tasks to fake bootclasspath and extdirs
> > by prepending the bootclasspath and any jar/zips in the extdirs
> > to the classpath.  It's not correct, but might be close enough.
> > Because they are not correct, they'll be considered "experimental",
> > but the compiler adapter will read the corresponding javac arguments.
> >
> > Some might think we shouldn't even pretend to support them,
> > and catastrophe might result; if so, bark now...
> >
> > Wes
> >
> >
> > Wes Isberg wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry, ajc 1.1, like the eclipse compiler it's built on, does not
> > > support the bootclasspath option any more.  Try using classpath.
> > >
> > > (We should have mentioned this in README-11.html where it talks
> > > about 1.0 compiler features not supported in the 1.1 compiler;
> > > I'll add it for the next release.)
> > >
> > > Wes
> > >
> > > Mark Panahi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It seems that the explicit bootclasspath attribute has been
> > > > remove in the new release.  I tried to use bootclasspath
> > > > with the X attribute instead but it gives me a message
> > > > saying that it is "ignoring"  the option I give it.
> > > >
> > > > Any help on getting this to work would be appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > -Mark
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
> > > > http://tax.yahoo.com
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-dev mailing list
> > aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users