RE: [aspectj-dev] Plan for AOSD release??

[Jim.Hugunin@xxxxxxxx]

The uses pointcut association is a feature-request and thus falls below my personal threshold for things to implement for this release.  If someone submits a tested patch I'd be happy to look it over.

-Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mik Kersten [mailto:mik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:14 PM
> To: Jim.Hugunin@xxxxxxxx; aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [aspectj-dev] Plan for AOSD release??
> 
> This works for me too.  That may not be enough time for me to get
> incremental working for the IDEs.  However, that could be a good thing for
> us to do together at this Sunday's code camp.
> 
> Jim, could you take a look at the attached message regarding the "uses
> pointcut" association?  Things depend on that structure being in the model
> so I'd like to get it working for this release.
> 
> Mik
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-dev-
> admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Jim.Hugunin@xxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 10:07 AM
> > To: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [aspectj-dev] Plan for AOSD release??
> >
> > Adrian Colyer wrote:
> > >
> > > How should we best plan for an AOSD release ( 1.1b6 | RC1 ) of
> AspectJ?
> > I
> > > still see plenty of CVS activity going on... :-).
> >
> > That CVS activity will hopefully get us to RC1 instead of just 1.1b6 :-)
> >
> > > I'm happy to do as much or as little as you need with respect to test
> > and
> > > packaging... if you want me to package and test then I suggest a CVS
> > chill
> > > at EOD on Tuesday: I'll then "pair" test with a colleague here in
> > Hursley,
> > > deliver test reports by Wednesday am (west coast) time for final
> > diagnosis
> > > and fixing, and do the final package and test on Thursday. We'll need
> > that
> > > length of cycle since we're not yet skilled enough in Hursley to
> > interpret
> > > and fix all of the problems that may come up. If it's easier to
> package
> > > and
> > > test directly in CA than that's fine too.
> >
> > This sounds like a good plan to me.  The deadlines are a little tight
> for
> > me, but since you're signing up for packaging and testing I'll figure
> out
> > a way to make it work ;-)  It's nice to see the time zone differences
> > working in our favor for once.
> >
> > > FWIW, on the current CVS level I'm seeing 12 failures in ajcTests.xml
> > > (both
> > > with & without emacssym)  - I've clipped the fails into the attached
> > file.
> >
> > Knowing this today rather than Wednesday is worth a lot.  My machine is
> > currently slightly out-of-sync with CVS as I'm in the middle of a bug
> fix,
> > but I'm not seeing these failures.  We should try to resolve this ASAP.
> > My suspicion is that these failures have to do with the details of your
> > configuration, but I'll look into that more later tonight.
> >
> > -Jim
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-dev mailing list
> > aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev