RE: [aspectj-dev] RE: Status of AspectJ test cases...

["Mik Kersten" <mik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Great.  We were misunderstanding and thought the P2s had to be fixed for a
beta release.

I'll look into these tests this afternoon.

Mik

> -----Original Message-----
> From: aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Jim.Hugunin@xxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:01 PM
> To: adrian_colyer@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [aspectj-dev] RE: Status of AspectJ test cases...
> 
> Adrian Colyer wrote:
> > Four failing tests remain:  (these are the same four that were failing
> > when
> > I started work)
> >
> > In EajcModuleTests:
> >
> > * org.aspectj.ajdt.ajc.AjdtCommandTestCase.testIncrementalOption (line
> 61)
> >
> > In AjdeModuleTests:
> >
> > * org.aspectj.ajde.StructureModelTest.testMainClassNodeInfo (line 122) :
> > testMainClassNodeInfo
> >
> > In TaskdefModule Tests:
> >
> > * org.aspectj.tools.ant.taskdefs.AJcTaskTest (line 248)  : testNoFile
> >
> > In TestingDriversModulesTests
> >
> > * org.aspectj,testing.drivers.HarnessSelectionTest.checkSelection (line
> > 255) : testIncrementalSuite
> 
> These tests were written by Mik and Wes, and you should get feedback from
> them to confirm whether or not they indicate something new is broken.  If
> these tests are not expected to be working, then they should be either
> commented out in the active cvs tree or marked with a clear message that
> they are a known issue and not a regression.
> 
> If you can resolve these four tests happily, then I think you're in a
> position to release 1.1b5.
> 
> -Jim
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev